Legal Opinion
Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1945No. 9898PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants brought this suit claiming that on July 1, 1935, appellee, the Friden Calculating Machine Company, a corporation, for a valuable consideration, appointed them its exclusive distributors in certain portions of the States of Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana, and that their appointment was to continue in force so long as appellants complied with the terms of the contract.
Appellants further alleged that appellee, the Friden Calculating Machine Company, had attempted wrongfully to cancel the contract and had entered into a contract with appellee, A. J. Gunderson,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Jacob v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- In Re Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc., Bankrupt. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- John P. O'Brien v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Tillman v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Manuel Ellis v. Victor M. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.