Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,904 William H. Marx and Florence Marx, His Wife v. Computer Sciences Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs (hereinafter Marx) appeal from a summary judgment for defendant Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) on plaintiffs’ claim for damages allegedly resulting from the violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and from the denial of plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. 1
Marx predicates his claim upon an earnings forecast made by CSC. His contention in substance is that the forecast was not in accordance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.