Legal Opinion
D.E. & J Ltd. Partnership v. Conaway
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 19, 2003No. 02-CV-70684-DTPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The above-captioned securities fraud action is a consolidation of several complaints 1 filed as putative class actions against five senior executive officers (the “Individual Defendants”) of Kmart Corporation and Kmart’s outside auditiors, Pri-cewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The case is presently before the Court on five separate Motions to Dismiss filed by the Defendants as their initial responsive pleadings. Plaintiffs have responded to the Defendants’ Motions to which response Defendants have replied.…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Winer Family Trust v. QueenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Pr Diamonds, Inc. v. John P. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Llewellyn-Jones v. Metro Property Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- In Re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- In Re Williams Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.