Legal Opinion

Starnes v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1968No. 276PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaice, J.

Unquestionably, the evidence of the plaintiff is sufficient, when taken to be true as it must be upon a motion for judgment of nonsuit, to show that in the course of the esophagoscopy performed by the defendant, the plaintiff’s esophagus was perforated and that infection resulted therefrom, causing the plaintiff to become a very sick man and to sustain pain, suffering, prolonged disability and increased expense. The question for determination is whether the evidence is sufficient to support a finding that the proximate cause of these unfortunate occurrences was a negligent failure of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Watson v. CluttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Mitchell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Galloway Ex Rel. Parks v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  4. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API