Legal Opinion
Obeid v. Meridian Automotive Systems
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 15, 2003No. 2:03-cv-72134PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION TO REMAND”
CLELAND, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Plaintiffs October 17, 2003 “Motion to Remand.” Plaintiff Fath Obeid initially filed this action in Michigan state court, alleging retaliatory discharge in violation of three statutes: (1) Michigan’s Workers’ Disability Compensation Act (“WDCA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 418.101 et seq.; the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.; and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act (“MPDCRA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.1101.
On May 30, 2003, Defendant Meridian…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hackworth v. Guyan Heavy Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Fields v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Fleming v. TinnellDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
- Napper v. GoodlettDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Sobel v. CameronDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.