Legal Opinion
Napper v. Goodlett
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 10, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00533Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CHELSEY NAPPER, et al. Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-533-RGJ KELLY HANNA GOODLETT, et al. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs Chelsey Napper, Cody Etherton, and Chelsey Napper as legal guardian, mother, next of friend of minors Z. F. and B. E. (“Plaintiffs”) moved to remand this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447. [DE 6]. Defendant Kelly Goodlet (“Defendant”)1 responded [DE 9] and Plaintiffs replied [DE 10].2 This matter is ripe. For the reasons below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.