Legal Opinion

Sobel v. Cameron

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided December 14, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00570Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION LISA SOBEL, et al. Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-570-RGJ DANIEL CAMERON, et al. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs Lisa Sobel, Jessica Kalg, and Sarah Baron (“Plaintiffs”) moved to remand this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447. [DE 7-1]. Defendant Attorney General Cameron (“Attorney General”) responded [DE 9] and Plaintiffs replied [DE 10]. This matter is ripe. For the reasons below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [DE 7-1] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API