Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Tinnell

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 2, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00125Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION GLEN FLEMING Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-00125-RGJ DONNIE TINNELL, et al. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Glen Fleming’s (“Fleming”) Motion to Remand [DE 37] and Defendants Floyd Cook, Dale Pressley, and Donnie Tinnell’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. [DE 31]. Briefing is complete. [DEs 45, 36]. These matters are ripe. For the reasons below, the Motion to Remand is DENIED and the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Ronald A. Landefeld v. Marion General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API