Legal Opinion
Badgley v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 24, 1994No. 90-265 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This opinion addresses defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed on June 1, 1993. We conclude that defendant’s motion should be granted.
I
On April 8, 1988, Robert and Colleen Badgley (plaintiffs) and the United States Small Business Administration (SBA) entered a contract for the sale of certain real property to plaintiffs. The events prior to and surrounding execution of the contract are as follows.
Before the submission of an offer by plaintiffs, Robert Badgley had several conversations with Benny A. Gutierrez, an authorized agent of the SBA,1 concerning the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Roseburg Lumber Company v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Conoco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Pratt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Schweiger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- CTA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.