Legal Opinion
Roseburg Lumber Company v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 13, 1992No. 92-1062PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RESTANI, Judge.
Appeal from decision of the United States Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals (“AGBCA”), Docket Numbers 87-344-1 and 88-172-1, denying plaintiffs consolidated appeal for: (1) reformation or termination of its timber-sale contract with the Forest Service; and, (2) damages. We affirm.
This appeal presents two issues; namely, whether the AGBCA erred in determining that plaintiff was not entitled to rely on the information misrepresented by the Forest Service and whether it erred in finding insufficient proof of injury to necessitate modification of the stumpage…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Dow Chemical Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.