Legal Opinion
Sangster v. Paetkau
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1998No. A081624PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McGUINESS, J.
Diane L. Sangster appeals from summary judgment entered against her on her complaint for malicious prosecution against Phoebe Hearst Cooke (Cooke), the San Francisco Equestrian Festival (the Festival), Tyler M. Paetkau, Philip M. Battaglia, and the law firm of Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine (Donovan Leisure) (collectively, respondents), arising from an underlying cross-complaint for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty filed against Sangster by Cooke and the Festival We conclude that respondents established the existence of probable cause to bring the underlying…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- HMS Capital, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.