Legal Opinion
HMS Capital, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 2004No. B158008PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
12 Cal.Rptr.3d 786 (2004)
118 Cal.App.4th 204
HMS CAPITAL, INC., etc., Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY, etc., Defendant and Appellant.
No. B158008.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three.
April 30, 2004.
Richard D. Marks Professional Corporation and Richard D. Marks for Defendant and Appellant.
Kester & Isenberg and Charles F. Kester for Plaintiff and Respondent.
ALDRICH, J.
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying an anti-SLAPP motion.[1] The motion contended that a malicious prosecution lawsuit should be stricken. We affirm the order denying the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.