Legal Opinion

Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. Interscope

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2008No. 05-56045, 06-55376PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge NOONAN.

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

In these consolidated malicious prosecution cases,1 William Tucker and the Estate of Cynthia DeLores Tucker (“the Tuckers”),2 appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to all defendants in both cases. In Tucker v. Interscope, we affirm the district court’s ruling as to all defendants. In Tucker v. Kenner, we affirm the district court’s summary judgment as to defendant Thomas; however, as to defendant Kenner we affirm the district court’s ruling in part and reverse in part, and remand…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Daniels v. RobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Paiva v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  5. Holt v. Noble House Hotels & Resort, LTDDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API