Augur v. Augur
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
This is an action for divorce on the grounds of intolerable cruelty. The trial court held that the plaintiff had failed to support the allegations of the complaint with any credible evidence, and rendered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed on the main ground that upon the undisputed and overwhelming evidence he was entitled to judgment.
Among the facts found by the trial court are the following: The parties intermarried in 1904. At the time of trial they were both sixty-six years of age. They lived a happy normal life until 1942 when the plaintiff began to pay attention to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dadio v. DadioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Hackenson v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Crighton v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Meech v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sitnik v. National Propane CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Bloomfield v. BloomfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Nowak v. NowakConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- Blue cross/blue Shield v. R.W.L. Corp., No. Cv92-033-10-89 (Apr. 26, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Kuhn v. Sadinsky, No. Knl-Cv-92-0523165-S (Mar. 14, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994