Legal Opinion
Crighton v. Jacobs
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 29, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The note sued upon is in form a negotiable promissory note, purporting to be signed by Milan E. Jacobs, the defendant’s intestate. The signature appears upon the extreme left-hand half of the instrument and beneath its terms; in other respects the note is in due form.
The assignment of errors relates to corrections of the finding and to rulings upon evidence. The defendant denied that her decedent promised to pay the plaintiff the $2,500, as set forth in the copy of the instrument, made a part of .paragraph one of the complaint, and she specially denied that her decedent, Jacobs, the alleged…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Cary v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Defeo v. HindingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Hine v. McNerneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Munson v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Automobile Insurance v. ConlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Bridgeport Airport, Inc. v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Barlow Brothers v. LunnySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.