Legal Opinion

Meech v. Malcolm

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 21, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action by the indorsee against the maker to recover the amount of a promissory note, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Holcomb, Jfacts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $1,564, and appeal by the defendant. This is an action upon a renewal note dated December 8th, 1909, payable six months after date to Randolph C. Andrus and William D. Johnson, or order, and transferred by them to the plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Action by the indorsee against the maker to recover the amount of a promissory note, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Holcomb, Jfacts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $1,564, and appeal by the defendant. This is an action upon a renewal note dated December 8th, 1909, payable six months after date to Randolph C. Andrus and William D. Johnson, or order, and transferred by them to the plaintiff. The complaint averred that the plaintiff “is now the bona fide holder and owner of said note.” The note in suit was the last of a series of renewal notes…

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

Forty of the reasons of appeal are predicated upon alleged errors of the trial court in finding or refusing to find certain facts. The defendant insists that none of these conclusions are justified by the evidence, which we have before us under § 797 of the General Statutes. We. have made a careful examination of this evidence, and are satisfied, that it discloses no. substantial reason for any material alteration in the finding of the trial court. Apart of the corrections and additions requested .are of immaterial.-or evidential facts. Others concern matters as to which the testimony was so…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Starkel v. Edward Balf Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Guerrieri v. MerrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Fellenbaum v. MarkowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  5. State v. Giant's Neck Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API