Legal Opinion

Bloomfield v. Bloomfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 29, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to obtain a divorce on the ground of intolerable cruelty and has appealed from a judgment for the defendant. The finding, with such minor corrections as are warranted, supports the determination that the conduct of the defendant was cruel but not intolerable.

“Intolerable cruelty” as used in § 7327 of the General Statutes has a subjective as well as an objective meaning. There must be not only proof of acts of cruelty on the part of the defendant but also proof that in their cumulative effect upon the plaintiff they are intolerable in the sense of rendering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gowdy v. GowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Goddard v. GoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Sarafin v. SarafinConnecticut Superior Court · 1968
  3. Henry v. HenryConnecticut Superior Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API