Legal Opinion

Hackenson v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 1, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

It is undisputed that upon the evidence the jury could properly have found that the plaintiff, while walking southerly across North Main Street in Waterbury from the northwesterly corner of its intersection with Bishop Street to the southerly side of North Main Street, in the exercise of due care, stepped into a hole or depression in the pavement located somewhere between the double trolley tracks near the center of the street, which caused her to fall, resulting in the injuries complained of. The question determinative of this appeal is whether the evidence warranted the finding of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adler & Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Sorenson v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. D'Andrea v. RendeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Wightman v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Marsh v. HandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RawlsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Lavieri v. UlyssesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. State v. BausmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. State v. OrsiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API