Legal Opinion

Dadio v. Dadio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1937PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

The parties to this case are husband and wife, and the present action was brought by the wife against the husband to recover certain payments claimed to have been due under the terms of a written contract between the parties. The case was tried to the court and judgment entered for the defendant, from which the plaintiff has appealed. The issue between the parties at the trial was which one breached the contract. On this appeal, the plaintiff seeks corrections of the finding for the purpose of showing that the contract was breached by the defendant, and the principal question raised is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGar v. Borough of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  2. Valente v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  3. G. F. Heublein, Inc. v. Board of Street CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Hurlburt v. BussemeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Lunde v. MinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Gorra Realty, Inc. v. JetmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Grievance Comm. of Bar of New Haven Cty. v. SinnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API