Legal Opinion

Frisch v. City of St. Charles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 23, 1926No. 25,336PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiffs, taxpayers therein, have made the city of St. Charles, the members of its council, its treasurer and recorder defendants in this action for the purpose of compelling the restitution to the city of $600 paid to defendant Scott (a member of the council), for a conveyance by him to the city of a lot upon which it was proposed to build a city hall. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, there was a dismissal on motion of defendants. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.

We have been informed in argument not only of the purchase of the lot and its conveyance but also that the city has gone…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Village of Pillager v. HewettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grady v. City of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lundin v. Township of Butternut ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Wakely v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Olsen v. Independent & Consolidated School District No. 50Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Kotschevar v. Township of North ForkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API