Legal Opinion

Lundin v. Township of Butternut Valley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1927No. 26,077PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appeal from an order denying a new trial, after a dismissal on defendant’s motion.

Plaintiff’s action urns to recover the agreed price and reasonable value for constructing a concrete bridge across a drainage ditch in the defendant township. The town board advertised for bids. No plans Avere on file with the clerk. Plaintiff and another contractor appeared. Each presented a so-called sketch and rough specifications Avith a bid, plaintiff’s being for $1,578. That being the loAver bid Avas accepted, and an entry thereof made in the minutes of the board. Later the board concluded to add four feet…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Laird Norton Yards v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Morris v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Frisch v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nordin Construction Company v. City of NomeAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Rettman v. City of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. James Michael McCONNELL, Appellee, v. Elmer ANDERSON Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Wakely v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Olsen v. Independent & Consolidated School District No. 50Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API