Legal Opinion
O'Brikis v. Supermarkets General Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 19, 1994No. 11867PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiffs, Nina O’Brikis and Gerald O’Brikis, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a jury trial that culminated in a general verdict for the defendant, Supermarkets General Corporation doing business as Pathmark of Orange. On appeal, the plaintiffs contend that the trial court improperly refused to give their requested jury instruction on contributory negligence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On the afternoon of August 29, 1986, the plaintiffs drove to the Pathmark in Orange to do their grocery…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- L'Heureux v. HurleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Stone v. BastaracheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gladstone, Schwartz, Baroff & Blum v. HovhannissianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Mazuroski v. HernovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Sturgeon v. SturgeonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Carano v. MoomeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Pieri v. City of BristolConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.