Mazuroski v. Hernovich

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment for the defendant rendered, following a jury trial. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury regarding the special defenses, and (2) denied his motion to set aside the verdict.1 The defendant *575asserts that the general verdict rule applies, precluding appellate review of the plaintiffs claims. We agree with the defendant and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On July 1, 1989, the defendant and the plaintiffs girlfriend were neighbors in Oakville. The…