Legal Opinion

Sturgeon v. Sturgeon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 2, 2009No. AC 29619PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Scott T. Sturgeon, appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered after a jury verdict in favor of the defendant Jeffrey Sturgeon. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to set aside the jury’s verdict and for a new trial on the ground that the jury could not have reached its conclusion reasonably and legally, (2) denied his motion on the basis of improper remarks made to the jury by the defendant’s counsel during closing arguments and (3) admitted a hearsay statement, limited the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Yeske v. Avon Old Farms School, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. Raybeck v. Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Jarvis v. LiederConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. 418 Meadow Street Associates, LLC v. One Solution Services, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Guiliano v. Jefferson Radiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. GeorgitseasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API