Legal Opinion

Pieri v. City of Bristol

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 15, 1996No. 14232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The plaintiff, Denis Pieri, appeals from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the city of Bristol. In his complaint, the plaintiff alleged that he was appointed to the position of fire marshal in January, 1982, and, for approximately eleven years, the city failed to compensate him. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) refused to *436allow a plaintiffs witness to testify to establish the city’s intent to enter into an implied contract with the plaintiff and (2) instructed the jury as to the statute of limitations governing the plaintiffs claim. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Selvaggi v. MironConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. BRAFFMAN v. Bank of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Braffman v. Bank of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Communications Systems v. Ceruzzi, No. Cv96 0153343 S (Oct. 23, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API