Legal Opinion
Carano v. Moomey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 29, 1998No. AC 17493PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Julia M. Carano, appeals from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, for the defendants, Marlene A. *384Moomey, Gary Grymkowski and John Grymkowski. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to set aside the verdict as to each defendant and (2) accepted the verdict without having the entire verdict read into the record. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The action arose out of an automobile accident that occurred on February 1, 1994, on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Burke v. AvitabileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gladstone, Schwartz, Baroff & Blum v. HovhannissianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Preston v. WellspeakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. GracewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Arnold v. MoriartyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. HorrocksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.