Legal Opinion

Johnson v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1951No. 673PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

Tbe defendant has brought forward numerous exceptions and assignments of error to tbe findings of fact by tbe court below. However, there is evidence to support such findings and tbe exceptions thereto will not be upheld.

Moreover, tbis appeal turns on tbe interpretation placed upon tbe endorsement attached to and made a part of Woodall’s policy of insurance.

It is apparent that Woodall applied for a license or permit from tbe State Corporation Commission of Virginia to operate a truck for hire in Virginia. Such Commission would have no authority to issue a license or permit to be used in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Birnbaum v. Jamestown Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Couk v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Crowell v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Hardin v. American Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Lineberry v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Scarboro v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Wright v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API