Legal Opinion

McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1951No. 18PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.

The question for determination is whether or not the delivery of the automobile by plaintiff’s sales manager to the prospective purchaser, under the above circumstances, was a voluntary parting with the possession thereof within the meaning of the exclusion clause contained in the plaintiff’s policy of insurance.

This controversy hinges on the proper interpretation of the exclusion clause with respect to what constitutes a voluntary parting of possession as contemplated by the contracting parties.

The appellant argues that the language used in the exclusion clause is not clear since the word…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. National Safe Deposit Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Crowell v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Penn v. Standard Life & Accidental InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Dawes v. Nash CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Cullen v. Valley Forge Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API