Legal Opinion

Couk v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1941No. 28312PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.

The record in this case was certified to this court because of conflict with the judgment of another Court of Appeals upon “questions of procedure pertaining to notice of appeals.” Such certification brings the entire case before this court. Pettibone v. McKinnon, 125 Ohio St., 605, 183 N. E. 786; Chicago Ornamental Iron Co. v. Rook, Admr., 93 Ohio St., 152, 112 N. E., 589.

Considering first, the procedural question here involved — the sufficiency of Couk and Spires’ notice of appeal — the applicable statute, Section 12223-5, General Code, provides:

“The notice of appeal shall designate the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Capital Loan & Savings Co. v. BieryOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Pettibone v. McKinnonOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. VolpeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Maritime Manufacturers, Inc. v. Hi-Skipper MarinaOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Grossnickle v. Village of GermantownOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API