Legal Opinion

Wright v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1956No. 529PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This case involves the coverage of an insurance policy on a Ford dump truck. The appeal challenges the acts of the court below in (1) allowing the defendant’s motion for nonsuit at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence and (2) excluding testimony offered by plaintiffs.

The allegations of the complaint are substantially as follows:

One. On 8 September 1951, in consideration of a premium of $129.30 paid to it, defendant issued its policy of collision insurance to George P. Wright on a 1951 Ford dump truck, a copy of which policy is attached to the complaint marked Exhibit A, and made a part thereof.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Textile Insurance v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Textile Insurance Company v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Rivers v. State Capital Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API