Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
In the court below, and here, the parties have selected the proper construction of the phrase “collision of the conveyance on which the goods are carried” as the battleground of debate and the crucial question for decision.
While this language, standing alone and strictly construed, might limit liability to a collision of the conveyance itself and not extend to a collision of the load on the truck, as held below, we regard the interpretation too restrictive under all the terms of the policy.
In the first place, the policy is a single “Trip Transit Policy,” which within itself implies protection…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Jones v. . CasstevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Wilkie v. New York Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Jones v. Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Wolverine Insurance v. Jack Jordan, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.