Legal Opinion

Application of Norris

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 2, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5633PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

In this appeal we are called upon to review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the Primary Examiner, finally rejecting the single claim of appellant’s application for a patent, serial No. 608,357, filed August 1, 1945, alleging new and useful improvements in a chemical product.

The claim was rejected by the Primary Examiner as unpatentable over the following cited prior art:

Signaigo 2,307,643 January 5, 1943; Meyer, Beilstein

(Handbuch (der Org. Chem.) Vol. 3, pages 681, 688 (1921) ; Wache Beilstein

(Handbuch der Org. Chem.)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. In Re HassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. In re LincolnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Application of HenzeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Application of SchechterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. Simon v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  5. Application of Henri Moureu and Paul ChovinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API