Application of Henri Moureu and Paul Chovin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112 of all claims in appellants’ application.1
The invention and its use are described by appellants in their application as follows:
“The compounds of the present invention are the 5:5/-dinitro-2:2/-dichlorohydrobenzoins conforming to the following planar formula:
*596which have been found to possess highly useful pharmacological properties which could not have been predicted from their chemical structure. In particular, they possess substantial anti-tubercular activity. They can also…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Winifred June Adams, David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Arnold N. JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of NorrisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Application of Willie Fong, Amon H. Brown, William L. Wasley, Robert E. Whitfield and Lowell A. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- August Urbanek and Estate of Irene Urbanek, Deceased, August Urbanek, Personal Representative v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Application of Paul Schmidt and Max WilhelmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Louise H. Brown and Ronald SwidlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Louise H. Brown and Ronald SwidlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.