Legal Opinion
In Re Hass
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 7, 1944No. Patent Appeal 4819PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the . Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims (Nos. 1, 2, and 3) in appellants’ application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to new and useful nitroolefins. The claims read:
“1. Nitroolefins having the general structural formula:
wherein R is a member of the group consisting of hydrogen and an alkyl group having in excess of one carbon atom.
“2. 2-Nitropropene.
“3. 2-Nitro-2-hexene.”
The references cited in the record and relied upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- In re LincolnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In re SwensonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.