Thompson v. Boisselier
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITE1» STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. APPEALS FROM:- THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE southern DISTRICT OF new TORE. • These are suits in equity, to restrain infringements of a patent. The facts which make the case are stated in the opin-. ion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchfobd
These are four suits in equity. The first one was brought in February, 1817, in 'the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri by Charles F. Blake, as trustee of William S. Carr and Frederick H. Bartholomew, against Elizabeth E. Boisselier and John C. Kupferle, for the infringement of reissued letters patent, No. 978, granted to William S. Carr, June 12, I860, for “improvements in water-closets,” the original patent having been granted to him August. 5, 1856, and, as reissued, extended, July 23, 1870, for seven years from August 5, 1870.
The second suit was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Slawson v. Grand Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hall v. MacNealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.