Legal Opinion

Application of Henze

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 3, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5659PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

On May 15, 1944, the appellant filed an application in the United States Patent Office for a patent covering improvements in “Hydantoins and Methods of Obtaining the Same.” The subject matter of the patent application is said to be a new class of chemical compounds valuable in therapeutic use by reason of high anti-convulsant activity combined with low toxicity.

On July 16, 1946, the Primary Examiner in the Patent Office entered a final rejection of all of the claims (1, 2, and 3) in the application as lacking invention over the disclosure appearing in a 1936 scientific…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. In Re HassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  3. In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. In Re SteenbockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. Application of BennerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API