Legal Opinion
Rummel v. Rummel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 14, 1993No. 11578PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
This is an appeal from orders issued in connection with the judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage. The defendant contends that the trial court improperly (1) made findings not reasonably supported by the evidence, and (2) abused its discretion in the assignment of property. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts necessary to a resolution of this matter are as follows. The parties were married in Westbrook on April 16,1977. There are no children of this marriage. The plaintiff was forty-five years of age at the time of the dissolution, and the defendant, forty-one. The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Telesco v. TelescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Caffe v. CaffeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Wolf v. WolfConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Jessica M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.