Legal Opinion
Graham v. Graham
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 1991No. 9047PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
In this dissolution action the defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion (1) in ordering him to pay periodic alimony, child support, and all costs incurred in connection with his occupancy of the marital home when the total of these payments exceeds his earning capacity, (2) in awarding the plaintiff a disproportionate share of the marital assets in light of its other financial orders and its refusal to return to the defendant his investment in the marital home, and (3) in awarding the plaintiff $15,000 as counsel fees in light of the other financial awards it made to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- O'Neill v. O'NeillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tessitore v. TessitoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Greco v. GrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cook v. BieluchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Siracusa v. SiracusaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.