Legal Opinion
Cummock v. Cummock
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 1, 1980PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether a motion for modification of an order for permanent alimony was properly denied. The plaintiff, Charlene Cummock, moved for modification of alimony for two reasons: (1) loss of support payments when her two daughters went to live with their father, the defendant David Cummock, and (2) diminution in her earnings. After a full hearing the trial court, Higgins, J., denied the motion for modification and this appeal was taken by the plaintiff.
The underlying facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff and the defendant were divorced in 1976, at which time…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Sanchione v. SanchioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Jacobsen v. JacobsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Guille v. GuilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.