Legal Opinion

Rawlinson v. Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2001No. 00-36PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[11] The sole issue before this Court is whether the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities (the BOPU) concluding that the appellants' claim was time barred 'under the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act statute of limitations. The order granting the BOPU's motion for summary judgment is affirmed.

ISSUES

[12] The appellants present the following issue for our review:

Whether the district court abused its discretion in finding that the appellants' cause of action accrued no later than June 23, 1995, rather than July 22, 1998,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Anderson v. BauerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Metzger v. KalkeWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lieberman v. MossbrookWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Nuhome Investments, LLC v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Robert L. Kroenlein Trust ex rel. Alden v. KirchheferWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Swinney v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API