Legal Opinion

Cathcart v. Meyer

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2004No. 04-32, 04-33, 04-34PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] Two incumbent state legislators and two electors challenge the constitutionality of Wyomtog’s initiative-engendered term limit statute. These cases come to us from the district court via W.R.A.P. 11 certified questions and W.R.C.P. 54(b) certification of an order rejecting affirmative defenses. We affirm the district court’s rejection of the affirmative defenses and we find the term limit statute unconstitutional.

CERTIFIED QUESTIONS

1. Is the term limit law for state elected officials (Wyo.Stat.Ann. § 22-5-103), whether adopted by initiative or legislative action,…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lieberman v. MossbrookWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hede v. GilstrapWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API