Legal Opinion

Nuhome Investments, LLC v. Weller

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2003No. 02-254PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[11] NuHome Investments, LLC (Nu Home) appeals the district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Russell E. and Elizabeth C. Weller (the Wellers). The district court granted the Wellers' motion for summary judgment finding that the contract on which NuHome sued provided for a one-year period of limitation. The complaint was not filed within one year of the alleged breach, thus the action was time barred. The district court additionally found that Nu-Home could not assert an unjust enrichment claim because it did not provide the Wellers with any goods or services…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Richard v. Carroll Home Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Holcomb Condominium Homeowners' Ass'n v. Stewart Venture, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Jacoby v. JacobyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Harlow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Swinney v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API