Legal Opinion

Swinney v. Jones

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2008No. S-07-0176PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T 1] Appellants (Sellers) filed - suit against Appellees (Buyers) alleging breach of a real estate sales contract. In response, Buyers sought dismissal and judgment on the pleadings asserting that the claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The district court granted the motions. Sellers appeal, contending that the doctrine of equitable estoppel precludes Buyers from asserting the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Did the district court err in determining that Sellers' claims are barred by the ten-year statute of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Olson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ecosystem Resources, L.C. v. Broadbent Land & Resources, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Nuhome Investments, LLC v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gee v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lieberman v. MossbrookWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Inman v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API