Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order entering summary judgment. The question is whether the lower court erred in finding appellants’ claims barred by the statute of limitations. We have concluded that the court did not err, and therefore affirm.
Appellants’ action is in trespass and assumpsit and is in four counts: negligence, breach of warranty, strict liability, fraud and conspiracy. Appellant-husband asks damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of occupational exposure to asbestos dust emanating from products manufactured by appellees, and appellant-wife asks damages…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.