Legal Opinion

State v. Nichols

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1984No. 83-906PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The narrow issue before us is whether a delayed appeal pursuant to App. R. 5(A) is available in a proceeding for postconviction relief. For the reasons set forth below we find no basis for such delayed appeal.

It is important to note that Nichols’ latest constitutional claims which ultimately resulted in the federal magistrate’s recommendation to grant the writ of habeas corpus were not presented to either the trial court or the court of appeals. Accordingly we will confine ourselves to the procedural question presented and make no attempt, in the interests of comity and federalism, to review…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. MilanovichOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Fred D. Ewing, Sr. v. Norris W. McMackinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. State v. BissantzOhio Supreme Court · 1987

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API