Legal Opinion

LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1987No. 86-959PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.

I

The first issue presented for our consideration is whether a trial court commits reversible error when it violates the express mandate of Civ. R. 47(C) by failing to discharge an alternate juror at the time the jury retires for deliberations and when it then substitutes an alternate juror for *123an incapacitated regular juror after deliberations have begun.

Maitland, Active, Cardinal, and Nationwide concede that the trial court violated Civ. R. 47(C), which provides in part that “[a]n alternate juror who does not replace a regular juror shall be discharged after the jury retires to consider its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. United States v. James Hillard, Robert Allen and Samuel HillardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Reichert v. IngersollOhio Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API