Legal Opinion
Da Roza v. Farrell
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1947No. Civ. 7407PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Edward L. Da Roza, one of five heirs at law of the estate of Frank L. Da Roza, deceased, has appealed from an order of the probate court confirming the sale of real estate. After a formal hearing at which the appellant appeared with counsel and filed objections to the sale, the court found that “it is for the advantage, benefit, and best interests of said estate and those interested therein that sale be made and confirmed,” and thereupon confirmed the sale. The appeal is presented to this court on a settled statement of the proceeding pursuant to rule 7 of Rules on Appeal.
It is contended the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Tennant v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Trigueiro v. SkowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Wickersham v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by26 opinions
- Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Mark Douglas Odom, United States of America v. Joyce Geraldine Beach, United States of America v. Benny Carol DysonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Buck Wilcoxon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. CarreonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.