Legal Opinion

Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1979No. 78-1071PublishedCited by 278 opinions

1Per curiam

Initially we are confronted with a challenge by appellant to the assumption of jurisdiction by the Court of Common Pleas in this cause. Specifically, appellant contends that Marie Dudukovich did not comply with the requirements of R. C. Chapter 2505, pertaining to the filing of a notice of appeal from an agency decision.2 R. C. 2505.04 provides, as follows:

“An appeal is perfected when written notice of appeal is filed with the lower court, tribunal, officer, or. commission. * * * [N]o step required to be taken subsequent to the perfection of the appeal is jurisdictional.”,R. C. 2505.07(B)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Village of GlendaleOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fulton v. State Ex Rel. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Arcaro Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by278 opinions

  1. Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Clinic Found. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Independence v. Office of the Cuyahoga Cty. Executive (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Henley v. Youngstown Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API