Legal Opinion

Klinicki v. Lundgren

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 7, 1984No. A7810-16086; CA A20084PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

In January, 1977, plaintiff Klinicki conceived the idea of engaging in the air transportation business in Berlin, West Germany. He discussed the idea with his friend, defendant Lundgren. At that time, both men were furloughed Pan American pilots stationed in West Germany. They decided to enter the air transportation business, planning to begin operations with an air taxi service and later to expand into other service, such as regularly scheduled flights or charter flights. In April, 1977, they incorporated Berlinair, Inc., as a closely held Oregon corporation. Plaintiff was a vice-president…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Durfee v. Durfee & Canning, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Klinicki v. LundgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Seiders v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Goodale v. LachowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Patmon v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
  5. Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API