Guth v. Loft, Inc.

Layton, Chief Justice,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

In the court below the appellants took the position that, on the facts, the complainant was entitled to no equitable relief whatever. In this court, they seek only a modification of the Chancellor’s decree, not a reversal of it. They now contend that the question is one of equitable adjustment based upon the extent and value of the respective contributions of the appellants and the appellee. This change of *266position is brought about, as it is said, because of certain basic fact findings of the Chancellor which are admittedly…